Although omission and substitution errors in neglect dyslexia (ND) patients have always
been considered as different manifestations of the same acquired reading disorder,
recently, we proposed a new dual mechanism model. While omissions are related to the
exploratory disorder which characterizes unilateral spatial neglect (USN), substitutions are
due to a perceptual integration mechanism. A consequence of this hypothesis is that specific
training for omission-typeNDpatientswould aim at restoring the oculo-motor scanning
and should not improve reading in substitution-type ND.With this aim we administered an
optokinetic stimulation (OKS) to two brain-damaged patients with both USN and ND, MA
and EP, who showed ND mainly characterized by omissions and substitutions, respectively.
MA also showed an impairment in oculo-motor behavior with a non-reading task, while EP
did not.The two patients presented a dissociation with respect to their sensitivity to OKS,
so that, as expected, MA was positively affected, while EP was not. Our results confirm a
dissociation between the two mechanisms underlying omission and substitution reading
errors in ND patients. Moreover, they suggest that such a dissociation could possibly be
extended to the effectiveness of rehabilitative procedures, and that patients who mainly
omit contralesional-sided letters would benefit from OKS.
Double dissociation in optokinetic stimulation sensitivity between omission and substitution reading errors in neglect dyslexia
Tipo Pubblicazione:
Articolo
Publisher:
Frontiers Research Foundation,, Lausanne , Svizzera
Source:
Frontiers in human neuroscience 7 (2013): 1-10. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00581
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Daini R, Albonico A, Malaspina M, Martelli M, Primativo S & Arduino LS/titolo:Double dissociation in optokinetic stimulation sensitivity between omission and substitution reading errors in neglect dyslexia/doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013
Date:
2013
Resource Identifier:
http://www.cnr.it/prodotto/i/323345
https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00581
info:doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00581
Language:
Eng